Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active

To:	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active cpupools
From:	Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:31:00 +0200
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 27 Oct 2010 21:31:54 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=ts.fujitsu.com; i=juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; q=dns/txt; s=s1536b; t=1288240262; x=1319776262; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; z=Message-ID:=20<4CC8FC84.1080109@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>\|Date:=20 Thu,=2028=20Oct=202010=2006:31:00=20+0200\|From:=20Juergen =20Gross=20<juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>\|MIME-Version: =201.0\|To:=20Ian=20Jackson=20<Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> \|CC:=20xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\|Subject:=20Re:=20[Xe n-devel]=20[PATCH]=20avoid=20numa=20placement=20of=20cpus =20with=20active=0D=0A=20cpupools\|References:=20<55538c59 d637fda3ec4a.1288093929@nehalem1>=20<19656.20267.209209.8 17343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>\|In-Reply-To:=20<19656.202 67.209209.817343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> \|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit; bh=QOL9RdqtF6y1Lc1mqGWtj4D6nTN3zrv66mdkpCF39/M=; b=T5/pwgYHbpIcLEaxlxC3rfFiri+RhoA6AIMMRrLX/uvp6u9+oYpjwGkB bNetGOugSFUBe1OlBEw3rIiYc1qusekZre/F97L6w5nSZaew7YTgN6Rkz QgWPDhXEwCWPyur1gLwTol2ZzOO+tGtLKy1QCSZVdQqvzoy05JB89EbdI RM1nI8HdLo2+2yVRGPmYNERtoUbVW2tsC/uiHFbJIsPQce2qRUUjhxRZ9 bH9qVGVZod2IIV35pP3mpY3Q5NMZZ;
Domainkey-signature:	s=s1536a; d=ts.fujitsu.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-SBRSScore:X-IronPort-AV:Received:X-IronPort-AV: Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization: User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VRFVmYMx+KwlkIZZRxePGgbSZrXxtw0ZNr+a7iO9kcwCy+Z/Nd2obEFL HdVU6OqVwv21gH0Hdh9ZRrxppMbpOQxCN+IZXTZxOud5qU9y+soULf7lm nCf6RcLPGx4FPDs1gO3K8Yqbs3sw0Qrzu36IDOkKxs2tD9yUbmzwLhX7a FnePk3JV9pJxoR/e9XHGq602Zx+e0d2S2rvVqJgrk3FCuxqyMo2oe0qfi hljUlbSz0NgoaSYVUpMiCKuxMwM4T;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<19656.20267.209209.817343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization:	Fujitsu Technology Solutions
References:	<55538c59d637fda3ec4a.1288093929@nehalem1> <19656.20267.209209.817343@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100913 Iceowl/1.0b1 Icedove/3.0.7

On 10/27/10 18:11, Ian Jackson wrote:

Juergen Gross writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active 
cpupools"):

When using cpupools don't pin vcpus to numa nodes as this might
conflict with the cpupool definition.
numa placement should be handled by cpupool configuration instead.


JOOI (and without looking at libxl to check) does this need a
corresponding patch for libxl ?


No, libxl doesn't include any numa related cpu placement up to now.


Juergen

--
Juergen Gross                 Principal Developer Operating Systems
TSP ES&S SWE OS6                       Telephone: +49 (0) 89 3222 2967
Fujitsu Technology Solutions              e-mail: juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Domagkstr. 28                           Internet: ts.fujitsu.com
D-80807 Muenchen                 Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active cpupool