This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active cpupool

To: Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with active cpupools
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 17:11:23 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:11:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <55538c59d637fda3ec4a.1288093929@nehalem1>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Newsgroups: chiark.mail.xen.devel
References: <55538c59d637fda3ec4a.1288093929@nehalem1>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Juergen Gross writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] avoid numa placement of cpus with 
active cpupools"):
> When using cpupools don't pin vcpus to numa nodes as this might
> conflict with the cpupool definition.
> numa placement should be handled by cpupool configuration instead.

JOOI (and without looking at libxl to check) does this need a
corresponding patch for libxl ?


Xen-devel mailing list