This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] Xen updates

To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] Xen updates
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:29:32 -0700
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:30:08 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1858642776.20101027212236@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4CC7681B.9060301@xxxxxxxx> <528869330.20101027105603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1288170828.8361.161.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <266556691.20101027115009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010271142220.1407@kaball-desktop> <61405929.20101027172904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010271814160.1407@kaball-desktop> <1858642776.20101027212236@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100921 Fedora/3.1.4-1.fc13 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.4
 On 10/27/2010 12:22 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Yes this enables the msi(-x) interrupts ! Thanks
> I will give the problem with the bios option another try as well.
> What i was wondering .. though ..
> Devices using normal interrupts generally get a low IRQ number
> Devices with MSI a higher, but MSI-X seem to get a low IRQ number as well, is 
> this expected ?

I think that's showing you what gsi you would get if you weren't using
msi.  What does /proc/interrupts show?


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>