|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi.
>>> On 22.10.10 at 15:57, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
> In none of these cases the evtchn would be masked for sure, so I'll have
> to test if the evtchn is masked and call move_masked_irq or
> move_native_irq accordingly. I preferred to test the evtchn_mask
> directly as opposed to the irq flags because the test is easier to
> understand (we could arrive in eoi_pirq from both handle_edge_irq or
> handle_fasteoi_irq, the latter doesn't set IRQ_MASKED when masks
> an irq).
But you still didn't add and IRQ_DISABLED check around the call
to move_masked_irq() - do you have any particular reason not to?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi.,
Jan Beulich <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: do not unmask disabled IRQ on eoi., Stefano Stabellini
|
|
|
|
|