|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 4] xen: introduce PHYSDEVOP_get_nr_pirqs
On 31/08/2010 13:49, "Stefano Stabellini" <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> Couldn't it, like, pick the smallest available? :-)
>>
>
> Well, it might still be useful to know the upper limit, besides linux
> tends to choose the pirq == irq and the irqs for MSIs are high.
> Xen does the same thing by the way.
Well I'm just being fussy because it's yet another irq related interface and
we seem to have so many already. Might-be-useful is different from
must-have-now, and if you are allocating pirq==irq then that allocation
strategy is not influenced by knowing nr_pirqs is it?
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|