|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command
To: |
Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command |
From: |
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:40:45 +0100 |
Cc: |
Ian, Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad, "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 31 Aug 2010 02:40:47 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4C7CAA1C.1030902@xxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F222A060143@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F222A060CFB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008231102520.2545@kaball-desktop> <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F222A060E65@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008251648250.2545@kaball-desktop> <4C760542.7080003@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008261311520.2545@kaball-desktop> <20100826135017.GA3792@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008261646560.2545@kaball-desktop> <4C770710.1040604@xxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008271151110.2545@kaball-desktop> <4C7CAA1C.1030902@xxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, Weidong Han wrote:
> > As stated above, xl doesn't know how to FLR a device, the dom0 kernel
> > provides a way to do it.
> > XCP kernels have pciback do_flr that has all the HW specific FLR
> > functions you are referring to AFAIK, but the pvops kernel, that uses
> > the standard reset node, does not.
> >
> >
> So it should implement specific FLRs in pciback like XCP/XCI.
>
Why should we reimplement pci FLR in pciback when the kernel has
already a way to do it?
I am not seeing pciback FLR going upstream easily.
Besides if some devices need specific FLRs, shouldn't the generic kernel
FLR function know about it?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Weidong Han
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command,
Stefano Stabellini <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] RE: xl fails to work with some command, Weidong Han
|
|
|
|
|