WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] [RFC] libxl: autogenerate type definition

from [Ian Campbell] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] [RFC] libxl: autogenerate type definitions and destructor functions
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:48:08 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:48:48 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <19553.25897.607156.664466@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <patchbomb.1280833215@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008041810170.19809@kaball-desktop> <19553.25897.607156.664466@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
On Tue, 2010-08-10 at 15:41 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] [RFC] libxl: 
> autogenerate type definitions and destructor functions"):
> > I really like the concept of this series, and for the moment I have
> > applied patches 1 and 2, I'll wait for the other issues to be settled
> > before applying the rest.
> > In particular I agree with Gianni and Ian on the fact that libxl data
> > structures should live in a separate idl-like file.
> 
> Yes, all excellent stuff, thanks Ian.

OK, I'll rebase (I've been away for a few days and no doubt everything
has changed under my feet ;-)) and repost for more in depth review.

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] [RFC] libxl: autogenerate type definitions and destructor functions, Ian Jackson
Next by Date:  [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1 of 7] xl: Return void from libxl_free() and libxl_free_all(), Gianni Tedesco
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] [RFC] libxl: autogenerate type definitions and destructor functions, Ian Jackson
Next by Thread:  Auto Reply: Re: [Xen-devel] problem using compiled kernel -- Sisu, annie . li
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy