| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [xen-devel][vNUMA v2][PATCH 2/8] public interface
On 03/08/2010 16:43, "Dulloor" <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Do you think the <start,end> ranges are also unnecessary, and
>> could really be replaced by just a size? I asked for that to be changed the
>> other way last time round.
> Actually, we don't need <start, end> ranges, since the nodes are always
> contiguous, which could be made implicit in domain builders (hvmloader
> and PV enlightenment).
> But, your previous suggestion to use <start, end> ranges could still
> be seen as style/consistency thing,
> which could be important in interfaces. Your pick :)
I think <start,end> is clearer.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home