|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] libxl: memory leaks
On 03/08/10 11:18, Gianni Tedesco (3P) wrote:
I wasn't aware that was the original design. It's certainly not the case
right now.
it has unfortunately diverged in some calls indeed.
AFAICS that scheme would only guarantee everything has been freed if the
caller calls ctx_free() at appropriate points. If libxl were used in a
daemon, for example, it would not be simple to come up with a scheme
that guarantees memory bounds that are independent from uptime.
This scheme is already in place in the ocaml binding
--
Vincent
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|