This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-devel] RE: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up

To: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up
From: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 23:14:09 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>, "Zhang, Jianwu" <jianwu.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:16:42 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100715122235.GE13291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <749B9D3DBF0F054390025D9EAFF47F221F579513@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100715094857.GC13291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100715122235.GE13291@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcskGGuIl/G9hGxSQvea64aKWz+JSQAFqhzA
Thread-topic: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up
Is type 11 data structure cover 0xEB180 ? where is the start address of type 11 
structure? and the max length ?

best regards

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Deegan [mailto:Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:23 PM
To: Zhang, Yang Z
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zhang, Jianwu; Xu, Jiajun
Subject: Re: cs:21768 causes guest spend more time on boot up

At 10:48 +0100 on 15 Jul (1279190937), Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 09:07 +0100 on 15 Jul (1279184841), Zhang, Yang Z wrote:
> >          In our recently nightly test, we find guest will cost more
> > time to boot up. After our investigation, we find that for rhel5u3 and
> > rh5u5 guest it will stop at ?start udev ? for long time when boot
> > up. And we find cs:21768 will cause this issue. Do you meet the same
> > problem?
> Nope, works fine for me[tm].  RHEL 5.5 stops at start_udev for about 5
> seconds, but that's not unusual.  I'll try RHEL 5.3.

I've reproduced this slowdown on CentOS 5.5 x64.  It seems to be caused
by the size of the SMBIOS tables - reverting the part of this cset that
adds a type 11 object fixes the boot time; then just making some of the
other SMBIOS strings longer causes it to hang again. I wonder whether
we're running into some other BIOS datastructure around 0xEB180


Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

Xen-devel mailing list