WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Help booting Xen under RHEL6 beta2

To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Help booting Xen under RHEL6 beta2
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 07:19:31 +0100
Cc: Konrad, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, DonDutile <ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>, Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 23:20:28 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <720e168c-c67f-4166-99b4-a34a9bc89455@default>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcsiCo2UjtMjJnqmTw2piJTGojpn9gASM0m6
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Help booting Xen under RHEL6 beta2
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205
On 12/07/2010 22:36, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Xen-4.0-testing:19983 would be the c/s being discussed there.
> 
> Could you confirm that number?  The changeset says
> "xend: Fix use of set() for Python 2.3" and it was
> 11 months ago which doesn't match the "roll back to
> xen-4.0.1-rc3" suggestion in the xen-users thread,
> so I'm confused.

Sorry it's 21182. I was looking in 3.4 tree by mistake.

 -- Keir

> The device-node minors do match between /dev/xen and /proc/misc.
> 
> I'm in the process of doing a fresh build which will
> take awhile.
> 
> Thanks,
> Dan
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 3:10 PM
>> To: Dan Magenheimer; Ian Campbell; Stefano Stabellini
>> Cc: Young; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; DonDutile; Konrad Wilk
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Help booting Xen under RHEL6 beta2
>> 
>> Xen-4.0-testing:19983 would be the c/s being discussed there. You could
>> try
>> reverting it and see how that goes for you. But if you have
>> /dev/xen/evtchn
>> and /dev/xen/gntdev then (assuming the device nodes aren't bogus for
>> some
>> reason, and there's no reason they should be) you should be good to go
>> in
>> this respect. You could double check by 'ls -l /dev/xen' and compare
>> the
>> device-node minors to the list in /proc/misc.
>> 
>>  -- Keir
>> 
>> On 12/07/2010 21:44, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> This recent thread from xen-users with the exact symptoms:
>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/xen/users/177223
>>> (see last in thread) implies that this is the result of
>>> a regression since xen-4.0.1-rc3, though it's vague on
>>> exactly what regressed ("evtchn stuff"?).
>>> 
>>> I'll try rebuilding to confirm.
>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 12, 2010 2:39 PM
>>>> To: Dan Magenheimer; Ian Campbell; Stefano Stabellini
>>>> Cc: Young; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; DonDutile; Konrad Wilk
>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Help booting Xen under RHEL6 beta2
>>>> 
>>>> On 12/07/2010 21:19, "Dan Magenheimer" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> So I rebooted (with xend disabled), manually started xenstored,
>>>>> and ensured xenstored is indeed running with ps -ef.
>>>>> Then I tried "xenstore-ls" and all I get is:
>>>>> 
>>>>> tool = ""
>>>>>  xenstored = ""
>>>>> local = ""
>>>>> 
>>>>> I tried this on a EL5-based distro running a 2.6.18.8-xen
>>>>> dom0 (with xend disabled on boot) and xenstore-ls gives
>>>>> me a long list of dom0 related registry entries.
>>>> 
>>>> Those dom0 registry entries would be written by xend. If you just
>> run
>>>> xenstored, you'd expect the database to be pretty empty. Looks like
>>>> xenstored is running okay. Perhaps xend is trying to connect to
>>>> xenstored in
>>>> a different way to xenstore-ls. There are two different ways to
>> connect
>>>> --
>>>> via a Unix domains socket /var/run/xenstored/socket; or via a kernel
>>>> device
>>>> /proc/xen/xenbus.
>>>> 
>>>>  -- Keir
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel