WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN][vNUMA][PATCH 7/9] Build NUMA HVM

To: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [XEN][vNUMA][PATCH 7/9] Build NUMA HVM
From: Dulloor <dulloor@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2010 23:07:35 -0700
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:08:29 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=14KrIkwz7ROMF4QctI/cJJbnsuA+YqX7iHUuUO69a2Y=; b=BqaGE5pgQTzNpTx7yZjOaJrmIaWGtmMery7tXyrH6YyUCiBLFvcqQ2WvspYk+rfjZ+ mQAYR/x5NCgJcV5cjEx9M6L9vmOn0nu3HRW7Ipwe2+6Yg3JChcT6W16mWHamABC2vAmu JBn3Xt/NUcC9KhB/enHrkt2TsrAf8j6tEOlr0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=uYUc7U4kD4ea3EwUzgHmLg0pxzBVRUR4Uz7RCjUPxidbxAWEzxshe1tgBjtAfSzhVL UDz1Vb51nBsjhwQsfj6BueHaMhxjKLmKYK1R5JIL8J/vuWxOhc/0+sZlrbqQIdGKMtaQ urlHluBwm/BDzlx/8HQ+9iM9xvBCAxc2G85QQ=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTincPzp_MHzKwHvnOjSe5Ci-fUftWlo7uClTk6VK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1BEA8649F0C00540AB2811D7922ECB6C9338B4D2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTil6lggj7AAMWZ31WG1b-J1MxUMI3M4FvKQMPAZ8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTincPzp_MHzKwHvnOjSe5Ci-fUftWlo7uClTk6VK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
WIth the NUMA allocator, pod is simply disabled as of now. This debug
statement seeped through when testing that. Will take care of it :)
However, I did test PoD for any regressions.

-dulloor

On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 2:55 AM, George Dunlap
<George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What's this line for:
>
>>+    if (nr_pages > target_pages)
>>     {
>>-        PERROR("Could not allocate memory.");
>>-        goto error_out;
>>+        pod_mode = 1;
>>+        mem_flags |= XENMEMF_populate_on_demand;
>>+        IPRINTF("I SHOULDN'T BE HERE !!\n");
>
> It's not clear what this patch does to the PoD logic... does it still
> need some work, or should I try harder to grok it?  Have you tested it
> in PoD mode?
>
>  -George
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel