| 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?
 
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 05:24:44PM +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Hi Konrad,
> 
> Congratulations from me as well, I would like to try your rebased tree, so 
> give a signal when the rebasing is finished.
> In the outstanding issues i'm missing the thing with pvgrub not working when 
> using pci-passthrough.
Oh yes. I keep on forgetting about that. Gotta fix that, thank you for
reminding me.
> Thx again for your hard work, makes domU support in mainline much more 
> complete :-)
Thank you guys for being willing to wait so long for this!
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-devel] upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?, Josip Rodin
- Re: [Xen-devel] upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?, Pasi Kärkkäinen
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?, Josip Rodin
 - Re: [Xen-devel] upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 - [Xen-devel] Failure to start xend with 2.6.32.15	(c2cb3df04eb3ff68d0de102b2acacc9b8616e659) under Xen 4.0, Boris Derzhavets
 - [Xen-devel] Re: Failure to start xend with 2.6.32.15 (c2cb3df04eb3ff68d0de102b2acacc9b8616e659) under Xen 4.0, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
  
- Re: [Xen-devel] upstream merge status for 2.6.35, .36?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    |