WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] RE: Adding ARM as a supported architecture

To: "Stephen Spector" <stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Ian Pratt" <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] RE: Adding ARM as a supported architecture
From: "Kathy Hadley" <Kathy.Hadley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 15:22:12 -0400
Cc:
Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 12:21:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726E68A554@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <D3E384327F5C6D48AADCEA84160B7D730131A870@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FA716B1526C7C4DB0375C6DADBC4EA35562035046@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <652FFB2C8F91E3428799B1FFF8B490C9726E68A554@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcriS91HN3G/4hpTRfqn+yZoh0Cb6QAAW2gwAACaJmAAAEIv4A==
Thread-topic: Adding ARM as a supported architecture
That's good to hear.  Since I won't be attending the Xen Summit on
Wednesday, how would I get more information about what is presented?

Thank you,
  Kathy Hadley

> > Are there any plans or opinions regarding adding ARM as an
additional
> > target architecture supported in the mainline Xen tree?  I am aware
> of the
> > "Xen ARM" and "Embedded Xen" projects, and they appear to be
> offshoots of
> > the mainline Xen tree.
> 
> Having ARM as a "first class" architecture for Xen would certainly be
> nice.
> 
> It's a case of getting the ARM port caught up with mainline
> development, and then keeping it there, which requires quite a
resource
> commitment from the ARM developers, though there are also plenty of
> benefits of being mainstream.  It's a topic I imagine is going to come
> up at the developer summit in Santa Clara next week...
> 
> UPDATE: Sang-bum Suh from Samsung is going to present the latest
> information on the Xen ARM project at Xen Summit on Wed.
> 
> ...spector

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>