This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Feature freeze for Xen 4.0

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Feature freeze for Xen 4.0
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 13:05:04 +0000
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Dec 2009 05:05:35 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091209123409.GA16033@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acp4y+hR6hROCGZQRXCaXsGQMGa5IgABFDI0
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Feature freeze for Xen 4.0
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 09/12/2009 12:34, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 11:42:55AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
>> Lots of new features have recently made it into the xen-unstable tree, and I
>> think now is the time to declare a freeze so that we can get 4.0 out the
>> door early in the New Year. If you're sitting on any feature patches,
>> declare them or send them on now - I want to freeze the tree except for any
>> agreed special cases at the end of the week.
> I've been thinking of implementing 'block-resize' feature, but haven't
> found time to do it yet.
> Would you consider this for inclusion in Xen 4.0, if I happen to find
> time for it? :)
> It shouldn't be very risky addition.. I guess most changes would be on
> the guest kernel side.

It would have to be ready pretty soon...

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list