This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Remus: control tool

To: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, andy@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] Remus: control tool
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 17:20:12 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 07:20:32 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091113213627.GD11642@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <patchbomb.1258074621@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091113141859.GB23952@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091113213627.GD11642@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 01:36:27PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Friday, 13 November 2009 at 09:18, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 05:10:21PM -0800, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > > The following patch series integrates the Remus control layer into
> > > Xen. It provides a single user-visible script ("remus") to activate
> > > Remus on a guest virtual machine, and the libraries required by that
> > > script.
> > 
> > Cool. Looking forward to read them.
> > > 
> > > Network buffering requires the linux IMQ (http://linuximq.net) patch
> > > to be applied to dom0. I'll mail the upstream version that applies to
> > > the linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree separately.
> > 
> > Is there a 2.6.31.x variant of the code? Are there plans to submit the
> > patches to LKML?
> I haven't tried to get this working on pvops yet, but it's simple in
> theory:
> domU ought to work now, albeit somewhat slowly since the pvops domU
> doesn't support suspend requests over a dedicated event
> channel. Cooking up a patch for this is probably not too hard.

Do you know if anyone is working on the pvops support for suspend requests
over dedicated even channel?

-- Pasi

Xen-devel mailing list