|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Relax assertion in VRAM tracking code
At 11:26 +0000 on 23 Nov (1258975601), Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> 16.11.09 18:00 >>>
> >The original assertion is too strict, as it includes the A/D bits of the
> >PTE, which (by design) can change under our feet.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Wouldn't the comparison a few lines down from the ASSERT() thus fixed
> also benefit from a similar adjustment?
Actually, on closer inspection my original fix was wrong; the bottom 12
bits of sl1ma are taken from the _pointer_ to the sl1e, not the
contents, so the assertion is plausible.
Keir, can you please revert it?
Tim.
--
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, Citrix Systems (R&D) Ltd.
[Company #02300071, SL9 0DZ, UK.]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|