WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Relax assertion in VRAM tracking code

To: "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Relax assertion in VRAM tracking code
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 11:26:41 +0000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 03:27:08 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091116170040.GC14284@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20091116170040.GC14284@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> 16.11.09 18:00 >>>
>The original assertion is too strict, as it includes the A/D bits of the 
>PTE, which (by design) can change under our feet.
>
>Signed-off-by: Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Wouldn't the comparison a few lines down from the ASSERT() thus fixed
also benefit from a similar adjustment?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>