WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] why would XENMEM_decrease_reservation fail?

To: <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] why would XENMEM_decrease_reservation fail?
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:52:44 +1100
Delivery-date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 14:53:10 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcpnD4IyWVbrQGBWQ9+Dq/yi1zkI+Q==
Thread-topic: why would XENMEM_decrease_reservation fail?
I am attempting to implement the kludge to make save/restore/migrate
work in the GPLPV drivers under Xen 3.4.1. On my test box I successfully
free grant_table_pages + 1 pages. The logs from another users system
show that each call to XENMEM_decrease_reservation returns 0 instead of
1.

Under what circumstances would XENMEM_decrease_reservation fail? The pfn
passed to XENMEM_decrease_reservation looks reasonable (similar values
to my test box), and everything else is identical.

Thanks

James


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>