| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] to fix the bug for tboot on x86_32 brought by c/
|
To: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cihula, Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>, "Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] to fix the bug for tboot on x86_32 brought by c/s 19914 and 19922 |
|
From: |
"Wang, Shane" <shane.wang@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Mon, 9 Nov 2009 10:55:56 +0800 |
|
Accept-language: |
en-US |
|
Acceptlanguage: |
en-US |
|
Cc: |
|
|
Delivery-date: |
Sun, 08 Nov 2009 18:56:53 -0800 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<C719FD3A.19675%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<4AF408A1.9060600@xxxxxxxxx> <C719FD3A.19675%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
Acpe1G/Uc8K6RsddTFuL30OEdNr1hgAKJL3vAHqtYyA= |
|
Thread-topic: |
[PATCH] to fix the bug for tboot on x86_32 brought by c/s 19914 and 19922 |
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 06/11/2009 11:29, "Shane Wang" <shane.wang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> The changesets 19914 and 19922 remove the bitmap for boot allocator,
>> which causes first_valid_mfn is reduced and starts from the end of
>> xen. On the other hand, on x86_64, the xen heap is got considering
>> e820 table, while on x86_32 the xen heap is specified to be <
>> xenheap_phys_end. This range overlaps tboot range. So, the tboot
>> range is scrubbed by scrub_heap_pages() during start_xen() on
>> x86_32. Then the result is that for TXT support on x86_32,
>> shutdown/reboot/Sx doesn't work properly. (i.e. hang)
>
> So... The problem is that xenheap on x86_32 does not respect e820?
> I'll fix that if that's the issue. It will be a much smaller change,
> and to arch/x86/setup.c only.
Yes, it is. It seems x86_32 only respects after xenheap is created.
>
> -- Keir
>
>> This patch is to fix that by reserving tboot range as "inuse" in xen
>> heap on x86_32. Then xen code will not touch the range.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home