xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation
To: |
Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation |
From: |
Glauber Costa <glommer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 10:29:01 +0100 |
Cc: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zach.brown@xxxxxxxxxx, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 03:52:52 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4AE7DC04.7080706@xxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<4f079cd6-0872-4cb5-832b-ee6a46841192@default> <4AE739DA.20601@xxxxxxxx> <4AE7DC04.7080706@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Jack Bauer |
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 07:52:04AM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 10/27/2009 08:20 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>> On 10/27/09 10:29, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>>
>>> Is there any way for an application to conclusively determine
>>> programmatically if the "fast vsyscall" pvclock is functional
>>> vs the much much slower gettimeofday/clock_gettime equivalents?
>>>
>>> If not, might it be possible to implement some (sysfs?)
>>> way to determine this, that would also be backwards compatible
>>> to existing OS's that don't have pvclock+vsyscall supported?
>>>
>>>
>> It would probably be simplest and most portable for the app to just
>> measure the performance of gettimeofday and see if it meets its needs.
>>
>
> How can you reliably measure performance in a virtualized environment?
If we loop gettimeofday(), I would expect the vsyscall-based version not to show
up in strace, right?
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation,
Glauber Costa <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Chris Mason
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] pvclock implementation in pv_ops kernel: why not __native_read_tsc()?, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] Re: pvclock implementation in pv_ops kernel: why not __native_read_tsc()?, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|