|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation
To: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation |
From: |
Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:52:04 +0200 |
Cc: |
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@xxxxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, zach.brown@xxxxxxxxxx, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, chris.mason@xxxxxxxxxx |
Delivery-date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:53:20 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<4AE739DA.20601@xxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<4f079cd6-0872-4cb5-832b-ee6a46841192@default> <4AE739DA.20601@xxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091014 Fedora/3.0-2.8.b4.fc11 Thunderbird/3.0b4 |
On 10/27/2009 08:20 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
On 10/27/09 10:29, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
Is there any way for an application to conclusively determine
programmatically if the "fast vsyscall" pvclock is functional
vs the much much slower gettimeofday/clock_gettime equivalents?
If not, might it be possible to implement some (sysfs?)
way to determine this, that would also be backwards compatible
to existing OS's that don't have pvclock+vsyscall supported?
It would probably be simplest and most portable for the app to just
measure the performance of gettimeofday and see if it meets its needs.
How can you reliably measure performance in a virtualized environment?
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to
panic.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation,
Avi Kivity <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Glauber Costa
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Chris Mason
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Avi Kivity
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation, Dan Magenheimer
- [Xen-devel] pvclock implementation in pv_ops kernel: why not __native_read_tsc()?, Dan Magenheimer
|
|
|
|
|