On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Stefano Stabellini, le Tue 13 Oct 2009 13:10:20 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Stefano Stabellini, le Tue 13 Oct 2009 13:00:09 +0100, a écrit :
> > > > I agree with you that we need to redesign these hypercalls, but I am a
> > > > fan of "doing one thing at a time" so I think we should decouple this
> > > > goal from the other one of making passthrough work with stubdom for the
> > > > moment.
> > > > This way we could first let people test it as it is, fix some bugs that
> > > > probably still affect the code, fix pci coldplug and add MSI-X support,
> > > > then redesign the hypercalls.
> > >
> > > For that you could just provide testers with this patch along with a
> > > strong warning that it's not safe (from a security point of view).
> >
> > In theory yes, but in practice not so many people read the list
> > compared to the people that actually chase xen-unstable.
>
> Would the latter report bugs they encounter?
>
I hope so, at least on xen-users.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Home