WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3 of 7] xen: allows more hypercalls from stubdoms

Stefano Stabellini, le Mon 12 Oct 2009 19:10:54 +0100, a écrit :
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Stefano Stabellini, le Mon 12 Oct 2009 18:20:09 +0100, a écrit :
> > > Stubdoms need to be able to make all the passthrough related hypercalls
> > > on behalf of the guest.
> > 
> > Tried before, nacked by Keir :)
> 
> Last time I spoke with Keir I got the impression that allowing only the
> hypercalls strictly needed for passthrough was OK.

Ok, but doesn't that open a door to passthrough an IRQ which was not
supposed to be passed through?  Doesn't it let a stubdom passthrough
IRQ0 for instance?

> In any case I would greately appreciate if all the other patches were
> accepted in any case because I wouldn't want them to bitrot.

I think they can go in, yes.

Samuel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>