WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Possible bug with pass-through hot-plug?

To: Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Possible bug with pass-through hot-plug?
From: Tom Rotenberg <tom.rotenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 11:08:38 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 02:09:04 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ae3jKMN1FUU5N4YmOwCm732LrjPtO8Tv1BpfnkfiBXI=; b=UFyNE+uPsgKAb9pzWbGr49xrMid3tny4+c6McvhiK6Q+fUdhyiDXvvI2UIfh8l8Uc2 4kft2X7yF2yXx1p8P7hdZdoupQDUTQrRZztwZ6DrSi/DJwTPe3kteNwE5XvJBBA0wlDz NlwCdxeT1W+rkMwpFKuw1Ej5FcpXFFngMycQA=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ek6Z2Ck24PhQ9I5SqSl783kLEFQ4/cW4YRS7OQalHS7vxX4+xlgLAYnhOAwDdmdKJV S30ybYJcZhlxKIBcn4U++b4zZLe/cVAuj2mpr7IdY9KUv09tndjBKUetA3h4nkPNkzqt V2o6UXDqCdmBJ+7agfQCm02D9csOkoNbRj1Jc=
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091012223616.GC9072@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <8686c3cd0910090136v633b1275k7d58c55a3645da65@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091009090743.GC7390@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <8686c3cd0910090430v49101412l93c8061d83d48b43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091009114720.GA29353@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <8686c3cd0910090449s19f7a44br91f3937f2ca485a3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091009120927.GA31495@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <8686c3cd0910090729p7f7a1c2aq482bf9c70fab0910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091010014127.GB22324@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <8686c3cd0910110257oa841842q2ed87f6b0f5b7a35@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091012223616.GC9072@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, i get the same result when i force the devfn. It only works, if u
assign it a "low" slot number (such as: 00:01.0).

I'm using 32-bit Windows.

Please update me with your findings.

Thanks!!

Tom

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:57:00AM +0200, Tom Rotenberg wrote:
>> Simon,
>>
>> Well, just tried it, according to what u requested, and it still doesn't 
>> work.
>>
>> Here are the lines from the qemu log:
>> ...
>> platform_fixed_ioport: changed ro/rw state of ROM memory area. now is rw 
>> state.
>> platform_fixed_ioport: changed ro/rw state of ROM memory area. now is ro 
>> state.
>> dm-command: hot insert pass-through pci dev
>> insert_to_pci_devfn: bdf_slt="0000:00:1b.0@e8"
>> insert_to_pci_devfn: devfn=0xe8 -> slot=0x1d, func=0x0
>> register_real_device: Assigning real physical device 00:1b.0 ...
>> pt_iomul_init: Error: pt_iomul_init can't open file
>> /dev/xen/pci_iomul: No such file or directory: 0x0:0x1b.0x0
>> pt_register_regions: IO region registered (size=0x00004000 
>> base_addr=0xfc220004)
>> register_real_device: Real physical device 00:1b.0 registered successfuly!
>> IRQ type = INTx
>> generate a sci for PHP.
>> deassert due to disable GPE bit.
>> pt_pci_write_config: Warning: Guest attempt to set address to unused
>> Base Address Register. [00:1d.0][Offset:30h][Length:4]
>> dm-command: hot remove pass-through pci dev
>> ...
>>
>> I performed the following sequence:
>> ...
>> xm create
>> <waited untill Windows booted>
>> xm pci-attach hvm 00:1b.0@1d
>> <I saw that it worked>
>> xm pci-detach hvm 00:1b.0
>> ...
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> thanks for the test results. I guess they were what you expected.
> They do seem to point to something in the hot-unplug code that
> Windows doesn't like. I'm a little confused by this thread,
> do you get the same result with your force devfn change?
>
> I'll try and get a test environment with Windows set up for myself.  Sorry
> if you have answered this before, but which version of Windows are you
> using and is it 32 or 64bit?
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>