This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] ABI/API breakage

To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ABI/API breakage
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:49:01 +0100
Cc: "dcm@xxxxxxxx" <dcm@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:49:43 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200907201637.40053.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcoJR7GGXF9ZoJq8RpeQgdA88rYtAwAAYZ1j
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] ABI/API breakage
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 20/07/2009 15:37, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Is xc_linux_build() the only problematic function? That one could be
>> reverted easily enough. Actually superpages should really just get bunged
>> in 'struct xc_dom_image' I think. Then the interface for all domain builder
>> functions reverts to what it was previously.
> For qemu, xc_linux_build() is the only one problematic function.
> From the engineering point-of-view, your proposal to collapse superpages
> into 'struct xc_dom_image' is the best solution.

Try changeset 19963.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>