This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] ABI/API breakage

To: Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "dcm@xxxxxxxx" <dcm@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] ABI/API breakage
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:15:31 +0100
Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 07:16:05 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200907201444.07522.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcoJPKoCJpyWwueTRSmWv2vN7dBBGQAB9/ta
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] ABI/API breakage
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 20/07/2009 13:44, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi!
> Changeset 19639 changed the ABI/API w/o taking care about backward
> compatibility.
> This breaks the xen build in upstream qemu in file hw/xen_domainbuild.c

Is xc_linux_build() the only problematic function? That one could be
reverted easily enough. Actually superpages should really just get bunged in
'struct xc_dom_image' I think. Then the interface for all domain builder
functions reverts to what it was previously.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>