|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang
 
| 
To:  | 
"Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx>,	"mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:24:55 +0100 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	"Kurt C. Hackel" <kurt.hackel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Tian,	Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>,	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:25:27 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<4D05DB80B95B23498C72C700BD6C2E0B2F9F62EC@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Thread-index:  | 
Acn+tZ24wQgV+EHPRx6jFo5ZCiRy2QAFY0twAAI23qA= | 
 
| 
Thread-topic:  | 
[Xen-devel] dom0 hang | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Microsoft-Entourage/12.19.0.090515 | 
 
 
 
On 07/07/2009 08:14, "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> BTW, why can't the tick be suspended when csched_schedule() concludes
>> it's idle vcpu before returning? won't that would make it less intrusive.
> 
> The tick suspend can be put in csched_schedule, but the suspend/resume logic
> is still needed in acpi_processor_idle anyway, due to another dbs_timer
> suspend/resume. The intention here is to make acpi_processor_idle the central
> place for timers which are stoppable during idle period. If there is other
> stoppable timer in the future, it can be easily added to acpi_processor_idle.
> So it is clean to keep current logic. and as long as we carefully not over
> doing the softirq, it looks not so intrusive. How do you think?
I think the approach is fine. I also already applied your patch since it is
obviously a good bug fix, even if it doesn't fix Mukesh's bug. And I fixed
the comment at the same time. And I backported it for Xen 3.4.1.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Keir Fraser
 
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
- Message not available
 - Message not available
 - Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, George Dunlap
 - Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
 - Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
 - RE: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Yu, Ke
 
- RE: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Yu, Ke
 - Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
 - RE: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Yu, Ke
 - Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang,
Keir Fraser <=
 - Re: [Xen-devel] dom0 hang, Mukesh Rathor
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |