|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hacke
Kernel been built appears to be 2.6.30-rc1-tip.
Works fine so far ( under the Xen 3.4-rc2-pre ).
I haven't tested network troughput between Dom0 and DomUs
Boris.
--- On Mon, 4/13/09, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
From: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree To: "Christophe Saout" <christophe@xxxxxxxx> Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Monday, April 13, 2009, 6:18 AM
On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 06:55:58PM +0200, Christophe Saout wrote:
> Hi Pasi,
>
> > > Latest tree (as of today) doesn't seem to build for me:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > Known problem?
> >
> > [written by Jeremy Fitzhardine:]
> >
> > Yes, sorry. I haven't been updating hackery much lately during
the
> > merge window. When we see what actually got merged next week,
I'll be
> > rebuilding the xen.git branch structure into something a bit cleaner
to
> > go on with. I think push2/xen/dom0/master is in a workable state.
>
> In the meantime, you can try to use that tree:
>
> http://git.saout.de/gitweb/?p=linux-dom0-pvops.git;a=summary
>
> It's the latest tip.git merged with one of the push branches from
> Jeremy's git repo and cherry-picked commits from the backend, blkback
> and netback trees plus minor merge conflict and compile problem fixups.
> It seems feature-complete to me, stable and is able to run DomU domains
> without problems.
>
Nice! I'll give it a try when I get back home from my easter trip :)
Thanks!
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|