This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hacke

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Christophe Saout <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree
From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 11:57:57 -0700
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1239562642; bh=PYxmWsSor3jiuccJ+AM++wNB6wVikiVw2TVc4mrW7r4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E8kFzQQX58IRvDSeChM3OarQ5xJtdvW9i7Z8+ANW4unUvpsycV4FvTEmIGCF4Kk3DdKcPQmuTV1ALql7D+tICSuU0jtiBN2aNq+qZOJjXuO8mbR0ZNRXKJnbc5xhMa2RpfdC8A72NLblJSL0+EqMaWwH57QUiGLxTrWwE659CCc=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=16/fVhwz43XZAM+tpa11BbLRwLBtULepbOv59NecExkjwZ/z0tLZzOAVq9ugcrb6NAJo7RpgsaLmMdo/nPGCBlKmaCXzM+je6cECRIWR8Xl7RQJ5jdL3BBwGhqomVaB8bDqq1oaNBhG0pJANar9DfsOjRNVd/kFCflukBkcdogQ=;
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1239555359.12706.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
What branch to check out ?


--- On Sun, 4/12/09, Christophe Saout <christophe@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Christophe Saout <christophe@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0 hackery tree
To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, April 12, 2009, 12:55 PM

Hi Pasi,

> > Latest tree (as of today) doesn't seem to build for me:
> > [...]
> >
> > Known problem?
> [written by Jeremy Fitzhardine:]
> Yes, sorry. I haven't been updating hackery much lately during the
> merge window. When we see what actually got merged next week, I'll be

> rebuilding the xen.git branch structure into something a bit cleaner to
> go on with. I think push2/xen/dom0/master is in a workable state.

In the meantime, you can try to use that tree:


It's the latest tip.git merged with one of the push branches from
Jeremy's git repo and cherry-picked commits from the backend, blkback
and netback trees plus minor merge conflict and compile problem fixups.
It seems feature-complete to me, stable and is able to run DomU domains
without problems.


Xen-devel mailing list

Xen-devel mailing list