This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] xen: pv domain support.

Alexander Graf wrote:

1) Migration path. If you could already use KVM on a Xen host, you could have Xen PV guests and KVM guests in parallel, easing migration to KVM for customers.

I like this, of course, but we have a path through Xenner. Maybe this (kvm-on-xen) path will be easier to take.

Oh, I thought Xenner was semi on hold? Is it still actively developed? I thought Gerd's main goal for now was to get qemu-dm into upstream qemu for now.

I understood that Xenner is the next thing on the list.

With npt/ept pv performance might be higher running under kvm+xenner than with software-only Xen by letting the guest kernel access pagetables directly. Though Gerd had some issues with 64-bit guests IIRC, which is a pity since it's there that the pv performance hit is greatest.

Well that might be true, but I'm not fully convinced yet :-). Either way with "current" hardware (pre-Nehalem, pre-Barcelona) PV is still faster.

Right, but every day this is becoming less important.

Also, FWIW IO performance on PV Xen is still way superior to KVM. Please correct me if I stand wrong there.

We still have some work some work to do on virtio, but bandwidth should be comparable. And it has nothing to do with pv-vs-fv.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>