|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support
George Dunlap wrote:
Gianluca Guida wrote:
Changing the p2m of course won't help in the shadow pagetables case. :/
No, but it seems to me that 1G p2m entries can't hurt performance for
shadows either, which is the question Dan was raising.
Yes, I am sure they won't. They'll make the p2m walk faster, which is
good, but wont' affect shadow performance in a significant way.
It might be nice to have some quick "sanity check" benchmarks, just to
make sure that adding the 1G pages won't hurt performance for the normal
case...
Might do it, but I don't think it's necessary.
Thanks,
Gianluca
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Huang2, Wei
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Huang2, Wei
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Wei Huang
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Wei Huang
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, George Dunlap
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Gianluca Guida
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support,
Gianluca Guida <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Gianluca Guida
- RE: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Huang2, Wei
- Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC][Patches] Xen 1GB Page Table Support, Wei Huang
|
|
|
|
|