 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch 1/3]RAS(Part II)--Intel MCA enalbing in XEN
| To: | "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch 1/3]RAS(Part II)--Intel MCA enalbing in XEN |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:31:03 +0000 |
| Cc: | Frank van der Linden <Frank.Vanderlinden@xxxxxxx>, "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:31:57 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <E2263E4A5B2284449EEBD0AAB751098401CE2D1419@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcmpO9Xiwud9AvZ0Qc2oWPMoegtSAQAAME0QAAB/yBE= |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch 1/3]RAS(Part II)--Intel MCA enalbing in XEN |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119 |
On 20/03/2009 09:23, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Christoph, I think this is two story. How to offline a page is a specific > recover action method, instead of the MCA itself. Or I missed anything? > > For guest owned page offline caused by #MC, Xen can't do anything but mark it > (the page frame, 4k) pending, so that when it is freed, it will not be > accessed anymore. > It will depends on the real recover action to make sure it will not be > accessed by guest anymore. For example, inject a vMC to guest, so that guest > can do offline itself, or kill the domain directly in some situation. > > Or do I missed anything? I agree it looked like a bit of a non sequitur to me as well. :-) -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] vtd: fix Dom0 S3 when VT-d is enabled., Cui, Dexuan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix domheap structure allocation when NUMA=on, Keir Fraser |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch 1/3]RAS(Part II)--Intel MCA enalbing in XEN, Jiang, Yunhong |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch 1/3]RAS(Part II)--Intel MCA enalbing in XEN, Christoph Egger |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
