| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Do not set page's count_info directly
Keir Fraser <mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/03/2009 12:45, "Gianluca Guida" <glguida@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Tim Deegan
> <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> The check doesn't tell you it's a shadow page -- it just tells you it's
>>> *not* allocated in another way. Checking with the mask is OK here,
>>> perhaps with a comment change.
>>
>> Yes, but this is what the code (in the shadow code) intends to check.
>> My complete plan is to have this macro and restore the idea of having
>> a flag for shadow pages because, as for now, the fact that we can't
>> distinguish clearly a shadow page should be considered a sort of bug,
>> given the code assumptions. Or at least a good basis for future bugs.
>
> I'm happy for shadow code to have another bit in count_info
> for its own use.
> I don't think it's good to have other code (e.g., generic page offlining
> code) peeking at it, is all. The particular case for a new
> flag described
> above sounds fine.
The new code is not using that flag anymore, it is use the
page_get_owner_and_reference() to get the owner.
Thanks
Yunhong Jiang
>
> -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home