WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support

To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] xen: core dom0 support
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:26:04 +0100
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:26:51 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20090302120445.GA29015@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1235786365-17744-1-git-send-email-jeremy@xxxxxxxx> <20090227212812.26d02f34.akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49A8DF28.4050301@xxxxxxxx> <20090228072055.GC9351@xxxxxxx> <49ABA633.2050903@xxxxxxxxxx> <20090302120445.GA29015@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> The current, out-of-tree xen kernel stuff is based on 2.6.18. 
>> [...]
> 
> Sure, but what i'm pointing out is the following aspect of 
> communication:
> 
>>>> [...] At the moment its all running on massive out-of-tree 
>>>> patches, which doesn't make anyone happy.  It's best that it 
>>>> be in the mainline kernel.  You know, like we argue for 
>>>> everything else.
> 
> Comparing it to a 2.6.18 base is simply misleading when it comes 
> to upstreaming something. Enterprise distros will rebase, and 
> their out-of-tree pile of patches will shrink.

I think Jeremy refers to the 2.6.18 kernel though.  And IMHO it isn't
misleading as this is the only option for a dom0 kernel.  Well, was
until very recently, now you can also run the latest pv_ops bits with
dom0 support.  That is still very young code though and I wouldn't use
that (yet) for production systems.  Works fine on my development box though.

The bits needed for pv_ops based dom0 support in arch/x86 is small
compared to what is already there for domU support.

cheers,
  Gerd

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel