RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] RAS(Part II)--MCA enalbing in XEN

["Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Keir Fraser [mailto:keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
>Sent: 2009年2月16日 23:03
>To: Christoph Egger; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Ke, Liping; Frank.Vanderlinden@xxxxxxx; Jiang, Yunhong; 
>Gavin Maltby
>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] RAS(Part II)--MCA enalbing in XEN
>
>On 16/02/2009 14:18, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> IMO, any design change should be discussed first and not changed
>> silently, since this will confuse everyone and noone will know
>> what is the right thing to do in Xen and in Dom0 and this
>> in turn will lead to error prone, unmaintainable code in both
>> Xen and in Dom0
>
>I certainly think we should have a shared approach for x86 
>machine-check
>handling, rather than completely different architectures for 
>AMD and Intel.
>Fortunately Sun are an interested and active third party regarding this
>feature. I'll be interested in their opinion.

Yes, we don;t want difference here, we change only mce-intel.c because this is 
just for discuss. 
And I remember SUZUKI Kazuhiro are also interesting on this topic (is CC'ed 
now).

Thanks
-- Yunhong Jiang
 
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel