|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] RAS(Part II)--MCA enalbing in XEN
 
| 
To:  | 
Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>,	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] RAS(Part II)--MCA enalbing in XEN | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:03:15 +0000 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
"Frank.Vanderlinden@xxxxxxx" <Frank.Vanderlinden@xxxxxxx>, "Jiang,	Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>,	Gavin Maltby <Gavin.Maltby@xxxxxxx>, "Ke, Liping" <liping.ke@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:04:05 -0800 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<200902161518.27385.Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Thread-index:  | 
AcmQQXqtyF5nSHVMThmKtiplWlhjsAABja3d | 
 
| 
Thread-topic:  | 
[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC] RAS(Part II)--MCA enalbing in XEN | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Microsoft-Entourage/12.15.0.081119 | 
 
 
 
On 16/02/2009 14:18, "Christoph Egger" <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> IMO, any design change should be discussed first and not changed
> silently, since this will confuse everyone and noone will know
> what is the right thing to do in Xen and in Dom0 and this
> in turn will lead to error prone, unmaintainable code in both
> Xen and in Dom0
I certainly think we should have a shared approach for x86 machine-check
handling, rather than completely different architectures for AMD and Intel.
Fortunately Sun are an interested and active third party regarding this
feature. I'll be interested in their opinion.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |