|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence
On 11/12/2008 00:47, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I guess not, due to same reason as why I sent out 1st patch idle
> vcpu state entry. The point is the current TSC value, which count
> from power on and is translated to a dozens of seconds for elapsed
> time upon a zero tsc stamp. :-( I didn't realize that point in the start...
Ah, because it's set up in early_time_init().
By the way, instead of avoiding NOW() early on, could we just set
local_tsc_stamp in early_time_init()? Then we could use NOW() when
initialising idle VCPUs, and also early on in init_xen_time()?
We could set stime_platform_stamp = NOW() too, so that platform time is
kicked off following BP's time.
I could send a patch which I find tasteful if you think this could work? :-)
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Tian, Kevin
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Tian, Kevin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Adjust time init sequence, Tian, Kevin
|
|
|
|
|