|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page()
>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 19.11.08 22:21 >>>
>Looking at c/s 18724 again also I wonder what fixmap_domain_page() was
>introduced for, rather than just using map_domain_page(). Is it an attempt
>to reduce global TLB shootdowns? It's not very clear nor very pretty and I'd
>rather just kill it and use map_domain_page().
Yes, this and avoiding the need to take another lock.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Cui, Dexuan
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(),
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|