|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page()
 
>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 19.11.08 22:21 >>>
>Looking at c/s 18724 again also I wonder what fixmap_domain_page() was
>introduced for, rather than just using map_domain_page(). Is it an attempt
>to reduce global TLB shootdowns? It's not very clear nor very pretty and I'd
>rather just kill it and use map_domain_page().
Yes, this and avoiding the need to take another lock.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread> |  
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Jan Beulich
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Cui, Dexuan
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Keir Fraser
 - RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Keir Fraser
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(),
Jan Beulich <=
 
  
  
  
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |