|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page()
>>> Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> 12.11.08 15:51 >>>
>I assume the 12% faster is on a benchmark...
It's the win for an application doing nothing but dirtying private mappings
of a file. That seemed like the least overhead test that wouldn't require any
special testing code in kernel or hypervisor.
>Have you measured how much faster the copy_page_sse2
>routine (standalond) is than the memcpy? Is it a
>factor of 2?
No, I didn't.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(),
Jan Beulich <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Cui, Dexuan
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add SSE-based copy_page(), Jan Beulich
|
|
|
|
|