This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] cpufreq status information

>>> Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 08.09.08 16:00 >>>
>After all, guest performance is at least as affected by CPU (and other
>resources) contention from other guests as it is by power-management
>governors in the hyeprvisor. Indeed, if the governors are doing their job
>right then guest performance should not be considerably impacted by them
>even in absolute terms.

Right you say 'if' - what if not? How do I tell, especially when I can't touch
the system and easily put a patched hypervisor and/or kernel on. If we
get a complaint from a customer that he thinks frequency scaling doesn't
do what it's expected to, we'll need to have a simple mechanism at hand
to determine what's going on with his box.

And even for development purposes I think a one-look proof that things
work as expected is quite useful (I'm doing the same for a few other basic
things - the interrupt rate being one of those that helped spot problems
that otherwise would have gone unnoticed for a much longer period of


Xen-devel mailing list