This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel i

To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation.
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 09:40:12 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:40:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48B3BE88.8090003@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AckHV1qUmU1HjHNKEd2/RwAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation.
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 26/8/08 09:27, "Gerd Hoffmann" <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Afaics there's some workflow or patchflow to
>> be worked out here:
> Workflow could look like this:
>  (1) Ian merges upstream into qemu-xen.
>  (2) I'll rebase my patches to the resulting tree.
>  (3) Merge both patchsets, into the trees.
> That should result in almost identical hw/xen* files in both trees, so
> we don't end up with a big mess when Ian merges again.

That sounds like a plausible avenue. I don't want to speak for Ian though:
he'll be the one doing most of the work on the qemu-xen side.

>> I can't see why we would take Gerd's patches wholesale
>> when we have a working patchset already.
> Which patchset you are refering to?  As far I know Ian & Samuel are
> focusing on getting the changes to generic qemu code upstream (such as
> serial and ide fixes which ran over the qemu-devel list already), not on
> the xen support bits.

Sorry, by patchset I meant qemu-xen. Bad confusing terminology on my part.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>