This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel i

To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation.
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:12:15 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:12:37 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48B2BE9E.3080905@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AckGxPT3M8QaDHK4Ed21VwAWy6hiGQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] xenner: add event channel implementation.
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 25/8/08 15:15, "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Another idea:  Do the initial merge in hw/, and later on, after the
>> qemu-xen tree catched up, move all xen (and xen emulation) bits to
>> another directory.  That would keep the scm revision history intact for
>> the Xen guys.
>> I also think we need to organize the source -- especially the header
>> files -- a bit better if we start to separate the code into more
>> subdirectories.  And I'd prefer to have some agreement on how the source
>> tree should look like before starting to shuffle around files, so I have
>> to do it only once ...
> Let's focus on merging and then once it's merged, we can reorganize
> files.  I still haven't seen any comments from the Xen guys wrt this
> patch series.  Has there been discussion on xen-devel that I missed?

With regard to this Xenner patch series, I don't think we have a strong
opinion. The changes are not particularly relevant to us. As long as the
orthogonal qemu-on-xen modes that we *do* care about can coexist happily
alongside, we'll be happy.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>