|
|
![](http://www.xen.org/images/globals/pixel.gif) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions
On 15/8/08 13:15, "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I can't really explain the results of testing with this version of the patch:
> While the number of false wakeups got further reduced by somewhat
> less than 20%, both time spent in the kernel and total execution time
> went up (8% and 4% respectively) compared to my original (and from
> all I can tell worse) version of the patch. Nothing else changed as far as
> I'm aware.
That is certainly odd. Presumably consistent across a few runs? I can't
imagine where extra time would be being spent though...
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen spinlock questions, Jan Beulich
[Xen-devel] Re: Xen spinlock questions, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
|
|
|
|
|