WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit

To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 00 of 36] x86/paravirt: groundwork for 64-bit Xen support
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:36:27 -0700
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>, Mark McLoughlin <markmc@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@xxxxxxxxxx>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@xxxxxxxxx>, Stephen Tweedie <sct@xxxxxxxxxx>, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 11:37:23 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20080630181221.GF23739@xxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080626105722.GA12640@xxxxxxx> <20080626105818.GA13805@xxxxxxx> <4863A8E6.1010807@xxxxxxxx> <20080627160333.GA27072@xxxxxxx> <486539A3.3030102@xxxxxxxx> <20080629084318.GA28815@xxxxxxx> <48684CD4.7040403@xxxxxxxx> <20080630082135.GA22844@xxxxxxx> <20080630092209.GA29815@xxxxxxx> <48691524.5010806@xxxxxxxx> <20080630181221.GF23739@xxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

config and full log can be found at:

 http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Mon_Jun_30_11_11_51_CEST_2008.bad
That config doesn't build for me. When I put it in place and do "make oldconfig" it still asks for lots of config options (which I just set to default). But when I build it fails with:

try 'make ARCH=i386 oldconfig' - does it work better that way?

Er, we're talking about 64-bit here, aren't we? The log messages are from a 64-bit kernel.

Well, it was the wrong config anyway, which I guess is the source of this confusion.

(I thought ARCH= to select 32/64 was going away now that the config has the bitsize config?)

   J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>