 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew iss
| To: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew issue |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 26 Mar 2008 10:13:55 +0000 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:15:35 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <C40FCF29.1E53B%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AciNk+8gVPQ6UlY+Q3imHZ2zMFtzTQA1gPlyAC47q+AAAVK7zwAAexWB |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew issue |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/11.4.0.080122 |
On 26/3/08 10:00, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Keir, we checked guest installation with rhel4u3 today, we compared c/s >> 17284 with c/s 16720, >> The result shows latest c/s with mmio emulation changes is a little bit >> faster than before on our test system with Xeon(r) processors, about 20 >> seconds faster. > > That's pretty surprising! I found out that slowdown on my P4 system for > WinXP installation is about 15%, so not as bad as I thought. And I can > probably reclaim most of that performance loss. > > I find it hard to explain a performance *win* though! Actually, how long does the install take in total? 20 seconds is probably in the noise. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Samuel Thibault |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Windows Bug Check 0x101 issue, Ian Jackson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew issue, Keir Fraser |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 --nonew issue, Li, Haicheng |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
