WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew iss

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew issue
From: "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:36:06 +0800
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 02:45:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C40E9004.1E4D6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <FC1D1B23302A22499C60C967336B2AE0028B7951@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C40E9004.1E4D6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AciNk+8gVPQ6UlY+Q3imHZ2zMFtzTQA1gPlyAC47q+A=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] VMX status report. Xen: #17270 & Xen0: #488 -- nonew issue
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 24/3/08 09:46, "Li, Haicheng" <haicheng.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> This is today's nightly testing report; no new issue today. Most of
>> case failures are due to bug #1183 and #1194 listed below.
>> 
>> For bug #1194, the issue `Linux booting hangs with "hda: dma..."
>> errors` got fixed on this c/s; but neither Windows nor Linux X can
>> boot up with setting sdl=1 and opengl=1 if guest's resolution is set
>> as 800 * 600 or higher.
> 
> Haicheng,
> 
> I guess you do your testing offline, but do you have a feel for how
> fast guest installation is now compared with a few weeks ago (before
> mmio emulation changes)? I'm thinking it's slowed down rather a lot,
> at least on my old Pentium 4 test system. :-(

Keir, we checked guest installation with rhel4u3 today, we compared c/s
17284 with c/s 16720,
The result shows latest c/s with mmio emulation changes is a little bit
faster than before on our test system with Xeon(r) processors, about 20
seconds faster.


-- haicheng

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>