|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 0/3] xen: Extend xen kexec hypercall to retur
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 08:55:18AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 28/2/08 03:35, "Simon Horman" <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I'll come right out and say that I don't fancy this two stage .c
> > indirectly including itself approach. And I hope this change can help us
> > move away from there, as well as providing the functionality
> > extendability that this patch set describes.
>
> You're not alone. ;-) However, it does work and anybody competent to clean
> it up seems to have plenty of other stuff to do!
I'm more than happy to clean it up if there is a chance the patches
will be accepted. I'll start working on that. But can we treat
that separately to this series?
--
Horms
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|