This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch 3/7] pvSCSI driver

Hi all,

Sorry for my limited reply. I could not follow high speed discussion
due to barrier of language and timezone. :-)

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 12:06:37 +0000
Steven Smith <steven.smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > However, this version went back to simple 1 ring architecture as same
> > as VBD. We expect the performance will not be degraded because many
> > transactions are distributed into multiple-rings.
> I'm not quite sure what you mean here.  You currently have a single
> ring per LUN; are you expecting heavy workloads to always be spread
> over several LUNs?

Our focussing domain is (was?) such an environment. However, it's not
only one as you mentioned. I understood that we have to improve
performance for each LUN access.

> > We would like to enhance it as second step after this version is
> > merged into Xen tree, if possible.
> As Ian points out, stuff in the stable trees is supposed to have a
> stable ABI, which can make some changes difficult.
> Of course, we might be able to declare the tree stable except for SCSI
> support, but that's a bit of a change from our current model.

I would like to merge our pvSCSI code into Xen tree. Therefore, I am
going to fix the code according to many comments I received. Could you
teach me the deadline of fixing the code? (Someone wrote previous mail

Jun Kamada
Linux Technology Development Div.
Server Systems Unit
Fujitsu Ltd.

Xen-devel mailing list