This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix xm vcpu-pin command

To: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Fix xm vcpu-pin command
From: Masaki Kanno <kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:30:32 +0900
Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:31:28 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C3E056E9.1CA38%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C3E056E9.1CA38%Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 09:50:33 +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:

>On 19/2/08 09:45, "Masaki Kanno" <kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I could not understand why the problem occurs.  But I would like to
>> solve the problem, so I send an ad hoc patch.  If you can solve the
>> problem, I hope that the problem is solved by your patch.
>In C, shifting by more bits than the width of the value being shifted is
>undefined. This explains the difference in behaviour between ia64 and x86.
>Your patch seems sensible.

Well, then could you apply my patch?

Best regards,

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>